Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20050505131459.B42300@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, 5 May 2005, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Can you have the same tags across different modules in the same CVS > server? If so, that would work. I believe that I can made a 'meta module' that, if I checked it out, would include all sub-modules, and that I can tag/branch appropriately ... if not, its just a matter of looping through each at the same time, a little more work, but not much more ... > If, as it currently appears, we'll end up moving in all of plphp, > pljava, plr, then we might as well be consistent and offer all > procedural languages, with the possible exception of plpgsql, > exclusively as a separate tarball, to be released exactly when a server > release is done. I believe that that is what Tom is proposing, and that I'm enthusiastically endorsing .. ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: