Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.LNX.4.44.0505030806400.478-100000@kix.fsv.cvut.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Increased company involvement (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> > Another example is the recent patch to check if there are orphaned file > system files. That was submitted, Tom had questions, I posted why I > thought it was valid, and the patch is going in today. Anyone has the > ability to argue their point and try to sway the community, and any > member has the right to request a vote on a specific issue. > I know so maintainig of PostgreSQL isn't easy. And it's normal so everybody wont to see commit of your patch. The comunication with core developers is best, but some times I have opinion so some patches are lost - for example my little patch SQLSTATE, .. I remeber situation one year ago with named params of plpgsql function. Patch waited half of year. I don't wont to be negative :-)). PostgreSQL did big progress. Really. And last modification of plpgsql helped my in work. But its human natural. I looking for others nows. I am expectant for 2PC, hiearch queries, and ... PostgreSQL isn't only sw for me, it's more like idol :-) Best Regards, Pavel Stehule
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: