Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200505032050.40769.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost wrote: > Just to point it out, Debian handles circular dependencies like these > without too much difficulty. It's really only an issue when first > building the various packages, and then you just build one without > all the support initially, build the other, then rebuild the first > with the support. I don't really believe that. People frequently do automated builds of the entire archive from scratch . There cannot be true circular build dependencies. That's the reason why the circular Qt <-> unixODBC dependency isn't resolved yet. Of course, on Debian, this whole discussion is moot anyway because the php-pgsql client module is built from an independent source package for other historic reasons. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: