Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> On Tue, 3 May 2005, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I think the idea is that plphp would be in our CVS, but would not be
>> shipped as part of the main tarball, rather as its own separate tarball.
> 
> 
> That is what I'm hoping for ... if it can be shipped as a seperate 
> tarball, my arguments *against* including it become moot, since 
> packagers (and ports) can have a nice small, quick to download package 
> instead of having to re-download a >11MB file each time ...
> 
> I don't mind if its *also* ship'd in the main distribution as well, I 
> just want that 'quick to download since I already have the 
> libraries/headers installed' package ...
> 
Any other PL's not currently in your CVS that you might consider to 
bring in while you're at it?

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren