Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement

Tom Lane wrote:
> I want them all in the same CVS basically to avoid any version skew
> issues.  They should always have the same branches and the same tags
> as the core, for instance; and it seems hard to keep separate
> repositories in sync that closely.

Can you have the same tags across different modules in the same CVS 
server?  If so, that would work.

> But packaging them as separately buildable tarballs that depend only
> on the installed core fileset (headers + pgxs) seems a fine idea.

If, as it currently appears, we'll end up moving in all of plphp, 
pljava, plr, then we might as well be consistent and offer all 
procedural languages, with the possible exception of plpgsql, 
exclusively as a separate tarball, to be released exactly when a server 
release is done.

Of course, there are a bunch of build infrastructure issues to be worked 
out, but let's settle on the tree structure first and then think about 
the build issues.  (But don't just move stuff and *then* think about 
the build issues.)

-- 
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/