Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200505031246.19426.peter_e@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Am Montag, 2. Mai 2005 20:14 schrieb Bruce Momjian: > I posted this compromise and no one replied so I thought everyone was OK > with it. It gets it into CVS, but has a separate compile stage to deal > with the recursive dependency problem. How will a "separate compile stage" work for actually building, say, RPM or Debian packages? The only way I can see is wrapping up the PostgreSQL distribution tarball a second time as a "plphp" source package and build from there, which seems quite weird. -- Peter Eisentraut http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: