Re: script binaries renaming
От | Michael Glaesemann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: script binaries renaming |
Дата | |
Msg-id | F85204CB-0ABC-4025-9257-ABA457650A9D@seespotcode.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: script binaries renaming (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: script binaries renaming
Re: script binaries renaming |
Список | pgsql-patches |
On Jul 7, 2007, at 13:50 , Tom Lane wrote: > Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: >> Dave Page wrote: >>> This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree >>> with >>> Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them >>> does >>> seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is just awkward to type. > >> But these utilities are mostly using in scripts -> one type, multi >> use. > > According to whom? The ones that are really at issue I think are > createuser/createlang/dropuser/droplang, and those seem mainly > intended > for interactive use. In a script you might as well use psql -c. I'm curious as to know how often these are used at all. I think I may have used createuser once and used to use createlang, but I can't recall ever using the others. Michael Glaesemann grzm seespotcode net
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: