Re: script binaries renaming
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: script binaries renaming |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 46903E03.2030700@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: script binaries renaming (Michael Glaesemann <grzm@seespotcode.net>) |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Michael Glaesemann wrote: > > On Jul 7, 2007, at 13:50 , Tom Lane wrote: > >> Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: >>> Dave Page wrote: >>>> This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree with >>>> Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them does >>>> seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is just awkward to type. >> >>> But these utilities are mostly using in scripts -> one type, multi use. >> >> According to whom? The ones that are really at issue I think are >> createuser/createlang/dropuser/droplang, and those seem mainly intended >> for interactive use. In a script you might as well use psql -c. > > I'm curious as to know how often these are used at all. I think I may > have used createuser once and used to use createlang, but I can't recall > ever using the others. > > Michael Glaesemann > grzm seespotcode net > I use createuser, createdb all the time, as well as createlang from time to time. I never use the drop versions. Regards, Dave
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: