Re: script binaries renaming
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: script binaries renaming |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 6227.1183834229@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: script binaries renaming (Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM>) |
Ответы |
Re: script binaries renaming
Re: script binaries renaming |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek.Kotala@Sun.COM> writes: > Dave Page wrote: >> This is almost as bad as Magnus agreeing with JD (!), but I agree with >> Peter :-). After years of typing the current names, changing them does >> seem somewhat annoying. Worse yet, pg_* is just awkward to type. > But these utilities are mostly using in scripts -> one type, multi use. According to whom? The ones that are really at issue I think are createuser/createlang/dropuser/droplang, and those seem mainly intended for interactive use. In a script you might as well use psql -c. The ones that have "db" in the name do not seem to me to need renaming. While maybe not obviously connected to Postgres, the chance of a collision with some other project is low. One that I'd personally vote to remove completely is "ipcclean". It's always been a crude, incomplete hack anyway, and the reason no one has bothered to improve it is that there is next to no use for it anymore. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: