Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 8126.1219171633@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > Joshua Drake wrote: >> Is our backpatch policy documented? It does not appear to be in >> developer FAQ. > Seems we need to add it. I'm not sure that I *want* a formal written-down backpatch policy. Whether (and how far) to backpatch has always been a best-judgment call in the past, and we've gotten along fine with that. I think having a formal policy is just likely to lead to even more complaints: either patching or not patching could result in second-guessing by someone who feels he can construe the policy to match the result he prefers. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: