Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200808191834.m7JIYl202518@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures (Joshua Drake <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua Drake wrote: > On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 14:29:52 -0400 (EDT) > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote: > > > > > Do I think it should be pushed back to 8.3.x; no. It is a feature. I > > > don't consider the existing behavior a bug. I consider it a > > > limitation and we don't back patch fixes for limitations. > > > > The bottom line here is that we don't have the time to explain or > > justify our backpatch policy every time someone shows up with a bug > > that needs to be fixed. > > Is our backpatch policy documented? It does not appear to be in > developer FAQ. Seems we need to add it. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: