Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
От | Dimitri Fontaine |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | B9E2A00D-D119-4A3E-AD58-EA037F8F3574@hi-media.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Le 19 août 08 à 20:47, Tom Lane a écrit : > I'm not sure that I *want* a formal written-down backpatch policy. > Whether (and how far) to backpatch has always been a best-judgment > call > in the past, and we've gotten along fine with that. I think having a > formal policy is just likely to lead to even more complaints: either > patching or not patching could result in second-guessing by someone > who feels he can construe the policy to match the result he prefers. Agreed. The problem here (at least for me) was to understand why this (yet to be reviewed) patch is about implementing a new feature and not about bugfixing an existing one. So we're exactly in the fog around the informal backpatch policy, and as long as we're able to continue talking nicely about it, this seems the finest solution :) Keep up the amazing work, regards, -- dim
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: