Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200808191858.m7JIw5T12382@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes: > > Joshua Drake wrote: > >> Is our backpatch policy documented? It does not appear to be in > >> developer FAQ. > > > Seems we need to add it. > > I'm not sure that I *want* a formal written-down backpatch policy. > Whether (and how far) to backpatch has always been a best-judgment call > in the past, and we've gotten along fine with that. I think having a > formal policy is just likely to lead to even more complaints: either > patching or not patching could result in second-guessing by someone > who feels he can construe the policy to match the result he prefers. OK, agreed. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: