Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5254.1216763669@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into
PG core distribution?
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 17:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Agreed, but I think the best response to that is something CPAN-like >> for people to easily get hold of recognized extensions, > It seems to me a better solution is to have appropriate repositories for > distributions that have them than some cpan style thing that is going to > break package dependencies. Better than CPAN is no problem ;-). My point is just that we should exploit PG's extensibility rather than assume that everything interesting must wind up in the core tarball. > apt-get install postgresql-plproxy > portinstall (I think that is the command) postgresql-plproxy I believe Devrim already has a yum repository up and running for RPM-based distros, though I'm not sure he's got anything but the core packages in it (yet). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: