Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1216764910.3894.513.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 2008-07-22 at 14:06 -0700, Josh Berkus wrote: > Minimalism isn't its own reward. Obviously Tom has reason to worry > about the overall maintenance effort for the PostgreSQL code. But we > need to balance that against the need to add features that users want > and will keep our community growing. Well, minimalistic is a new compliment for me... ;-) Every time we add code to core, the next patch just got bigger since we must always include all aspects of the server features. I want to *increase* the extensibility of Postgres with plugins and APIs. When you mention what we could learn from MySQL, I would say introduce pluggable extensibility in more places. Solving the putting the pieces back together problem is a somewhat easier problem than trying to maintain a whole spittoon full of (cool) extensions in core. Do you want Tom to a) spend a month improving the optimizer b) get him to review already working code so we can package things It's a question of priorities. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: