Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David E. Wheeler
Тема Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Дата
Msg-id 4C5FD1C2-A5AB-41C7-8503-7A6CC33E32F7@kineticode.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Jul 28, 2008, at 18:31, Tom Lane wrote:

>> To upgrade from citext, I expect
>> that what one will have to do is to alter the column to change its
>> data type from citext to TEXT + collation.
>
> What I'm wondering is how closely that will match the semantics of the
> contrib module ...

By "semantics" do you mean behavior, in terms of how closely operator  
comparisons will return the same results? I have no idea, personally,  
but it's no worse then TEXT, is it? The use of TEXT and LOWER() being  
what people are doing now?

Best,

David


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Python 2.5 vs the buildfarm