Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48864BC1.1040906@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom, Simon, etc.: Of the several things which "PostgreSQL could learn from MySQL" which we covered at pgCon was that the requirement to hunt hither and yon for popular add-ins is one of the primary reasons for developers not using PostgreSQL. Further, one of the main reasons why people do use PostgreSQL is our advanced functionality. If we focus only on core SQL features, there are few reasons to use us over MySQL, Oracle express, SQL Server, or Firebird. Minimalism isn't its own reward. Obviously Tom has reason to worry about the overall maintenance effort for the PostgreSQL code. But we need to balance that against the need to add features that users want and will keep our community growing. If the way to do this is by packaging stuff together but maintaining separate CVS trees, then ok -- but then we need a plan for how we're going to do that, rather than just rejecting patches. The general case aside, I really feel strongly that citext belongs in core unless we come up with some other means to do case-insensitive text. It's one of the top 10 newbie questions. --Josh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: