Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Дата
Msg-id 48864BC1.1040906@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Tom, Simon, etc.:

Of the several things which "PostgreSQL could learn from MySQL" which we 
covered at pgCon was that the requirement to hunt hither and yon for 
popular add-ins is one of the primary reasons for developers not using 
PostgreSQL.

Further, one of the main reasons why people do use PostgreSQL is our 
advanced functionality.  If we focus only on core SQL features, there 
are few reasons to use us over MySQL, Oracle express, SQL Server, or 
Firebird.

Minimalism isn't its own reward.  Obviously Tom has reason to worry 
about the overall maintenance effort for the PostgreSQL code.  But we 
need to balance that against the need to add features that users want 
and will keep our community growing.

If the way to do this is by packaging stuff together but maintaining 
separate CVS trees, then ok -- but then we need a plan for how we're 
going to do that, rather than just rejecting patches.

The general case aside, I really feel strongly that citext belongs in 
core unless we come up with some other means to do case-insensitive 
text. It's one of the top 10 newbie questions.

--Josh



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Plans for 8.4
Следующее
От: Markus Wanner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Plans for 8.4