Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
От | Greg Sabino Mullane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 0057334c721cf5d3253dc2f7ed354abb@biglumber.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: RIPEMD160 > Do you want Tom to > a) spend a month improving the optimizer > b) get him to review already working code so we can package things Actually, if the alternative is having the pieces outside of core where Tom never sees them, I'd vote for (b), as the optimizer already kicks ass but having Tom review other code is pretty invaluable. Code outside of core, is, in reality, less reviewed, less likely to work well with recent PG versions, and more likely to cause problems. It's also less likely to be found by people, less likely to be used by people, and less likely to be included by distros. Not to say that everything should get shoved into core, of course, but there are strong arguments for both sides. - -- Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200807231145 http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iEYEAREDAAYFAkiHUlgACgkQvJuQZxSWSshURACg2MIfdH0cJOTf75HmuGEzlxo6 OBQAn21sqZ+rBEel1cf2dAIYpoWPHwW5 =Pj7J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: