Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
От | Shane Ambler |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 48862839.5060400@Sheeky.Biz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? (Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dave Cramer wrote: > > On 21-Jul-08, at 4:28 PM, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 01:17:39PM -0700, David E. Wheeler wrote: >>> pgFoundry ain't the CPAN, alas. >> >> Maybe that's the problem that really needs solving? >> >> One of the big Postgres features is its extensibility. I agree >> that the extensions can sometimes be hard to find, but surely the >> answer to that is not an infinitely large source tarball? >> >> > I'd have to agree with Andrew here. Making it easy to get extensions > would solve lots of problems. What about starting a secondary team that would review extensions? Projects on pgfoundry could be identified as reviewed and approved as a type of recommendation that they are of acceptable quality to use in production - maybe against certain versions. What I would see is current core developers teaching a new group of developers to do the add-on code reviews to a point where they could continue on by themselves - one or two from core may wish to stay in this group - with core checking in from time to time to ensure the quality doesn't slip. Thereby giving some confidence in the use of the add-ons that get *certified*. A new add-on would be presented to this group and maybe voted on in one of the lists (General or Admin?) to get acceptance into the review process. Anyone interested in starting this? I do agree that the main code doesn't need to contain every feature that is available. But we do need to improve the perception of add-ons. Hardly anyone thinks twice about adding an extension to firefox, perl, gimp or oscommerce or even drivers to the os, and we need to aim for a similar thought here. I do think that having a list of reviewed and approved add-ons that is easily found on the main site along with release downloads will help along those lines. We need to promote that postgresql isn't a one-size-fits-all solution, it is a solid product that can be customised to suite your needs. -- Shane Ambler pgSQL (at) Sheeky (dot) Biz Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: