Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
| От | Michael Meskes |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20130403093147.GB12905@feivel.credativ.lan обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
|
| Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 05:06:08AM -0400, Dave Page wrote: > PostgreSQL support companies do not generally produce PostgreSQL > binary packages that are available for anyone to use (for a service > fee or otherwise) either via download or on a platform like a cloud > service. There are a handful of exceptions to that rule (EDB for > example, as we produce the installers), but most, if not all of those > companies are on the packagers list already. So that means if said support company creates packages for its customers it should be on the packagers list? After all anyone could get the packages from that company, couldn't they? Is there a any description as to who is eligible for the packages list? And of course I take it there is a code of conduct for this list, albeit Heroku didn't honor that one. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: