Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Selena Deckelmann
Тема Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
Дата
Msg-id CAN1EF+y9rwzGpJqjzjB56th8uKH5DVJQd0wkB1Fkfnb_yDw-DA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions  (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>)
Список pgsql-advocacy



On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote:
* Selena Deckelmann (selena@chesnok.com) wrote:
> None are empowered to sign contracts or legally represent the developers
> who make up PGDG.

It is not the developers comprised of PGDG who are required to sign into
an NDA.  It is company A, B, or C who would need to sign an NDA with "some
legal entity", giving that legal entity the power/right to sue company A,
B, or C, were they to release the information provided to them
inappropriately under a breach of contract.

Notionally, perhaps a PGDG developer would provide the data to the
'legal entity' who would then provide the information to the company, to
legitimatize the contract, but that would not require any NDA or
contract to be signed by the PGDG developer.

Hmmm. Interesting.

Yeah, not a fan :)

-selena


--
http://chesnok.com

В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Dave Page
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
Следующее
От: "Joshua D. Drake"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions