Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130409165516.GA27905@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious
questions
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 2013-04-09 12:29:37 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote: > * Joshua D. Drake (jd@commandprompt.com) wrote: > > On 04/09/2013 09:01 AM, Michael Meskes wrote: > > >>Well no because traditional packagers all release at the same time > > >>so that there is no disparity between when Ubuntu gets the fix and > > >>Solaris gets the fix. > > > > > >So what do I misunderstand? As far as I read it, Damien said all should get the > > >fix at the same time, right? Which is what you say and also what Dave said, > > >isn't it? I think the question we're dancing around here is, should anyone be > > >allowed to deploy before the embargo is over? I don't mind DBaaS providers > > >getting the fix early, but I mind seeing it deployed early. > > > > Maybe I wasn't clear, sorry. No. I do not believe that ANY entity > > should be able to deploy before the embargo is over. > > Then perhaps I'm missing something, but what's the point in getting the > update if you can't actually apply it until everyone (including the bad > guys) know about it? Particularly when applying it is going to take a > whole lot more time than it takes for the bad guys to probe your systems > and figure out which aren't patched yet... Patching, packaging and verifying that the package works takes time, especially if you run a modified version of postgres. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: