Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
От | Michael Meskes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20130403120139.GA15898@feivel.credativ.lan обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 07:52:33AM -0400, Dave Page wrote: > Even if you put that aside though, there are nearly 300 > support/services companies in our directory, most of whom are likely > to be unknown to the majority of us. Obviously there's no way we would > include all of them on the -packagers list, so how do we decide > fairly? Yep, that's the tricky point. And we may run into the same problem DBaaS when more companies offer a hosted PostgreSQL version. > > So then it's a matter of users? What is the number of user one has to have to > > qualify? How do we count users? Installations, db admins, real database users > > as in customers? > > Yes, that is what needs debate. I don't know how we can write down > specific criteria. I do know that when we tried to do something > similar to define who goes on the sponsors page, we got nowhere at all > because it's *really* hard to write such rules, without almost > immediately finding some exception that we'd have to make. True. Michael -- Michael Meskes Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org) Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org Jabber: michael.meskes at gmail dot com VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: