Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 516435D1.5020506@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions (damien clochard <damien@dalibo.info>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 04/09/2013 01:38 AM, damien clochard wrote: >>> No. >>> >>> That isn't to say I didn't understand that theory of doing so. I do. >>> However, you essentially created a class of user that is above other users >>> and that is explicitly not Open Source. >> >> I'm not arguing either way here... but if you think of DBaaS as "the >> new packaging", it starts to seem more reasonable to give folks like >> Heroku access at the same time as the traditional packagers. >> > > Just to make things clear : my previous message is not about wether or > nor a DBaaS provider should have early access to security releases (even > if that's a good question). > > My message is about wether or not a DBaaS provider should be allowed to > deploy the security release days before the official release date. > Right. Which I don't think they should be able to. Joshua D. Drake -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC @cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: