Re: snapper vs. HEAD
От | Tom Turelinckx |
---|---|
Тема | Re: snapper vs. HEAD |
Дата | |
Msg-id | cb6eefe1-7dde-4279-855b-2c9ba89cf621@www.fastmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: snapper vs. HEAD (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: snapper vs. HEAD
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, Tom Lane wrote: > Thanks! But it doesn't seem to have taken: snapper just did a new run > that still failed, and it still seems to be using -O2. Snapper did build using -O1 a few hours ago, but it failed the check stage very early with a different error: FATAL: null value in column "classid" of relation "pg_depend" violates not-null constraint I then cleared out the ccache and forced a build of HEAD: same issue. Next I cleared out the ccache and forced a build of HEAD with -O2: this is the one you saw. Finally, I've cleared out both the ccache and the accache and forced a build of HEAD with -O1. It failed the check stageagain very early with the above error. > to move to a newer Debian LTS release? Or have they dropped Sparc > support altogether? Wheezy was the last stable release for Debian sparc. Sparc64 is a Debian ports architecture, but there are no stable releasesfor sparc64. I do maintain private sparc64 repositories for Stretch and Buster, and I could configure buildfarm animalsfor those (on faster hardware too), but those releases are not officially available. Best regards, Tom Turelinckx
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: