Re: snapper vs. HEAD

"Tom Turelinckx" <pgbf@twiska.com> writes:
> In the past, I've already switched from gcc 4.6 to gcc 4.7 as a workaround for a similar compiler bug, but I can't
upgradeto a newer gcc without backporting it myself, so for the moment I've switched snapper to use -O1 instead of -O2,
forHEAD only. 

Thanks!  But it doesn't seem to have taken: snapper just did a new run
that still failed, and it still seems to be using -O2.

> Not sure whether wheezy on sparc 32-bit is very relevant today, but it's
> an exotic platform, so I try to keep those buildfarm animals alive as
> long as it's possible.

Yeah, I've got a couple of those myself.  But perhaps it'd be sensible
to move to a newer Debian LTS release?  Or have they dropped Sparc
support altogether?

(As of this weekend, it seemed to be impossible to find the wheezy sparc
distribution images on-line anymore.  Fortunately I still had a download
of the dvd-1 image stashed away, or I would not have been able to recreate
my qemu VM for the purpose.  It's going to be very hard for any other PG
hackers to investigate that platform in future.)

            regards, tom lane