Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it?
От | The Hermit Hacker |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | Pine.BSF.4.05.9905181431150.446-100000@thelab.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it?
Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, 18 May 1999, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > After reading a couple more complaints of hashtable-overflow error > > messages, I went ahead and rewrote the hash join modules so that they > > don't use fixed-size hash buckets and a fixed-size overflow area. > > Instead, each bucket is just a linked list of tuples (thus no wasted > > space for underused buckets) and everything is put into a private portal > > so that reclaiming the space is easy/quick. The code is noticeably > > shorter and more readable than before. > > > > The limited amount of testing I've been able to do here shows no > > problems. > > > > Now: do I commit it, or wait till after 6.5? I promised Marc the latter > > a couple weeks ago, but I am mighty tempted to just go for it... > > Shhh. He will never know. Did you promise Marc, or did you answer him > evasively, like I suggested? > > Basically, with the new optimizer, this may be a bug fix because of the > more frequent hashjoins. That has always been my smokescreen to add the > feature. Tom...make you a deal. If you are confident enough with the code that when v6.5 goes out in ~13days, it won't generate more bug reports then its fixing...go for it. :) Marc G. Fournier ICQ#7615664 IRC Nick: Scrappy Systems Administrator @ hub.org primary: scrappy@hub.org secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: