Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21476.927063970@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes: >> Basically, with the new optimizer, this may be a bug fix because of the >> more frequent hashjoins. That has always been my smokescreen to add the >> feature. > Tom...make you a deal. If you are confident enough with the code that > when v6.5 goes out in ~13days, it won't generate more bug reports then its > fixing...go for it. :) OK, you're on --- I feel pretty good about this code, although I'm never prepared to guarantee zero bugs ;-). If there are any, we can hope they'll show up before the end of beta. A note for anyone testing the new code: the hashtable size (which is now a target estimate, not a hard limit) is now driven by the postmaster's -S switch, not the -B switch. -S seems more reasonable since the table is private memory in a backend, not shared memory. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: