Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 199905181518.LAA27021@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | I've got it, now should I commit it? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] I've got it, now should I commit it?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> After reading a couple more complaints of hashtable-overflow error > messages, I went ahead and rewrote the hash join modules so that they > don't use fixed-size hash buckets and a fixed-size overflow area. > Instead, each bucket is just a linked list of tuples (thus no wasted > space for underused buckets) and everything is put into a private portal > so that reclaiming the space is easy/quick. The code is noticeably > shorter and more readable than before. > > The limited amount of testing I've been able to do here shows no > problems. > > Now: do I commit it, or wait till after 6.5? I promised Marc the latter > a couple weeks ago, but I am mighty tempted to just go for it... Shhh. He will never know. Did you promise Marc, or did you answer him evasively, like I suggested? Basically, with the new optimizer, this may be a bug fix because of the more frequent hashjoins. That has always been my smokescreen to add the feature. :-) -- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: