Re: JDBC bug?
От | Colin Freas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | IIEPJDIJEEBPKJGDFFBEAEDMCAAA.cef6@georgetown.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JDBC bug? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: JDBC bug?
Re: JDBC bug? |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
> via quoted mixed case identifiers. I haven't seen any evidence that > basic SQL operations (select, insert, update, delete) have a bug in them. I'd peg a where clause as a basic SQL operation, and be it bug, feature, annoyance, whatever, it wasn't functioning because of the case of a column name. This worked: 1. rs = stmt.executeQuery("select * from response"); But I wanted to do this, which didn't work: 2. rs = stmt.executeQuery("select * from response where questionID=16"); This is how I got it to work: 3. rs = stmt.executeQuery("SELECT \"response\".\"questionID\", \"response\".\"respondentID\", \"response\".\"answer\", \"response\".\"ID\" FROM \"response\" WHERE "\response\".\"questionID\"=16"); Sorry, does anyone think the third is better than the second?
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: