Re: JDBC bug?
От | Ross J. Reedstrom |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20011126153922.A5801@rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JDBC bug? ("Colin Freas" <cef6@georgetown.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 03:41:28PM -0500, Colin Freas wrote: > > via quoted mixed case identifiers. I haven't seen any evidence that > > basic SQL operations (select, insert, update, delete) have a bug in them. > > I'd peg a where clause as a basic SQL operation, and be it bug, feature, > annoyance, whatever, it wasn't functioning because of the case of a column > name. > > This worked: > 1. rs = stmt.executeQuery("select * from response"); > > But I wanted to do this, which didn't work: > 2. rs = stmt.executeQuery("select * from response where questionID=16"); > > This is how I got it to work: > 3. rs = stmt.executeQuery("SELECT \"response\".\"questionID\", > \"response\".\"respondentID\", \"response\".\"answer\", \"response\".\"ID\" > FROM \"response\" WHERE "\response\".\"questionID\"=16"); How about: 4. rs = stmt.executeQuery("select * from response where \"questionID\"=16"); Quote what you must, and no more. > > Sorry, does anyone think the third is better than the second? > Yes, since it conforms to SQL92. If you'd bothered to check the postgresql log, you would have seen error messages of the form: test=# select * from response where questionID=16; ERROR: Attribute 'questionid' not found Which would have clued you into what the problem was. Alternatively, try your queries in psql so you can _see_ the responses. Ross -- Ross Reedstrom, Ph.D. reedstrm@rice.edu Executive Director phone: 713-348-6166 Gulf Coast Consortium for Bioinformatics fax: 713-348-6182 Rice University MS-39 Houston, TX 77005
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: