Re: JDBC bug?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200111262013.fAQKDb415577@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | JDBC bug? (Nate Gelbard <gelbardn@tripwire.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: JDBC bug?
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
> I haven't seen any evidence in this thread of a JDBC bug. The original > posting refered to calls in the DatabaseMetaData classes doing > toLowerCase(). This is appropriate because the DatabaseMetaData class > is querying the pg_* tables to get information about database objects, > thus since the backend stores the identifiers in lower case, therefore > the jdbc code needs to do a toLowerCase(). The followup below is more But the backend doesn't store identifiers in lowercase if they have created mixed-case identifiers with double-quotes, right? I am confused. > of a complaint on how SQL is case insensitive and if you have created > your objects with quoted mixed case identifiers you need to access them > via quoted mixed case identifiers. I haven't seen any evidence that > basic SQL operations (select, insert, update, delete) have a bug in them. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: