Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Brad DeJong
Тема Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Дата
Msg-id F8F0ED16CB59F247B7EFD0E1DB34BC1F5CB5AA30@USALWEXMBX3.infor.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion  (Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Список pgsql-jdbc
Vladimir wrote:
> Well, current milestone has slipped a bit
> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/milestones, however there are just a
> couple of issues due.
> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/690 "executeBatch vs
> serverprepared=0" -- needs review
> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/611 "feat: allow byte[] and String to
> be accessed as .getLob, and .getClob" -- test should be reviewed (e.g.
> assert messages added)

I read this as a request for assistance in reviewing these pulls. I looked over the byte[]/Blob part of pull 611 (PgByteaBlob and PgByteaBlobTest) and submitted comments. AbstractBasicLob and PgResultSet changes look good. I did not look over the String/Clob part yet.

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Brad DeJong
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
Следующее
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion