Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion
От | Dave Cramer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CADK3HHJezjOuyk8BfxU6OSpwG_yeDyymjTLpF-b4uKejJ_J=fg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Versioning policy PgJDBC - discussion (Brad DeJong <Brad.Dejong@infor.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 29 November 2016 at 01:19, Brad DeJong <Brad.Dejong@infor.com> wrote:
Vladimir wrote:> Well, current milestone has slipped a bit> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/milestones, however there are just a > couple of issues due.> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/690 "executeBatch vs > serverprepared=0" -- needs review> https://github.com/pgjdbc/pgjdbc/pull/611 "feat: allow byte[] and String to > be accessed as .getLob, and .getClob" -- test should be reviewed (e.g.> assert messages added)I read this as a request for assistance in reviewing these pulls. I looked over the byte[]/Blob part of pull 611 (PgByteaBlob and PgByteaBlobTest) and submitted comments. AbstractBasicLob and PgResultSet changes look good. I did not look over the String/Clob part yet.
@Brad,
this is great, thanks!
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: