Re: Ready to launch?
От | Dave Page |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ready to launch? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E7F85A1B5FF8D44C8A1AF6885BC9A0E4528023@ratbert.vale-housing.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Ready to launch? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Ответы |
Re: Ready to launch?
Re: Ready to launch? Re: Ready to launch? |
Список | pgsql-www |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] > Sent: 20 December 2004 16:53 > To: Dave Page > Cc: Robert Treat; pgsql-www@postgresql.org > Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Ready to launch? > > "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: > > Which reminds me of a problem - *all* the website in CVS is > published > > under the BSD licence, however that includes the elephant > which Emily > > pointed out was a $100 stock photo. Technically that means > we cannot use > > the elephant... > > How so? The BSD license is not antithetical to living beside non-free > stuff (unlike GPL). >I agree it would be a good idea to point out > somewhere in the relevant docs that the elephant image isn't BSD'd, > just so no one mistakenly thinks it is. Oh no, that's not what I meant. The entire site is in CVS (in fact, periodically rebuilds itself from CVS), and that CVS is advertised by the Gborg site as being covered by a BSD licence. It's not easy to edit that as the licence is one of a number of standard ones used site wide. If we keep the elephant in CVS, then I think we would need to include a note saying that it is not included in the licence on every place we have/display that licence. Not only is that a pita, but is also made more difficult for the reason mentioned already. Are there no good royalty free alternatives around? Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: