Re: Ready to launch?
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Ready to launch? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20041220134628.T37736@ganymede.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Ready to launch? ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-www |
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004, Dave Page wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] >> Sent: 20 December 2004 16:53 >> To: Dave Page >> Cc: Robert Treat; pgsql-www@postgresql.org >> Subject: Re: [pgsql-www] Ready to launch? >> >> "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk> writes: >>> Which reminds me of a problem - *all* the website in CVS is >> published >>> under the BSD licence, however that includes the elephant >> which Emily >>> pointed out was a $100 stock photo. Technically that means >> we cannot use >>> the elephant... >> >> How so? The BSD license is not antithetical to living beside non-free >> stuff (unlike GPL). >> I agree it would be a good idea to point out >> somewhere in the relevant docs that the elephant image isn't BSD'd, >> just so no one mistakenly thinks it is. > > Oh no, that's not what I meant. The entire site is in CVS (in fact, > periodically rebuilds itself from CVS), and that CVS is advertised by > the Gborg site as being covered by a BSD licence. It's not easy to edit > that as the licence is one of a number of standard ones used site wide. > If we keep the elephant in CVS, then I think we would need to include a > note saying that it is not included in the licence on every place we > have/display that licence. Not only is that a pita, but is also made > more difficult for the reason mentioned already. > > Are there no good royalty free alternatives around? Could we not put it outside of CVS and just link'd in via the IMG SRC tag? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: