Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore
От | Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT |
---|---|
Тема | Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | E1539E0ED7043848906A8FF995BDA579030D41B6@m0143.s-mxs.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Do we want the following: > > > 1. pg_dump issues "set statement_timeout = 0;" to the > database prior to > > taking its copy of data (yes/no/default-but-switchable) > > 2. pg_dump/pg_restore issue "set statement_timeout = 0;" in > text mode > > output (yes/no/default-but-switchable) > > 3. pg_restore issues "set statement_timeout = 0;" to the > database in > > restore mode (yes/no/default-but-switchable) > > I think "yes" for all three. There was some handwaving about someone > maybe not wanting it, but an utter lack of convincing use-cases; so > I see no point in going to the effort of providing a switch. > > Note that 2 and 3 are actually the same thing (if you think they are > not, then you are putting the behavior in the wrong place). I thought a proper fix for 3 would not depend on 2 ? Andreas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: