Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 9542.1209834096@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | statement timeout vs dump/restore (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore
Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: > Do we want the following: > 1. pg_dump issues "set statement_timeout = 0;" to the database prior to > taking its copy of data (yes/no/default-but-switchable) > 2. pg_dump/pg_restore issue "set statement_timeout = 0;" in text mode > output (yes/no/default-but-switchable) > 3. pg_restore issues "set statement_timeout = 0;" to the database in > restore mode (yes/no/default-but-switchable) I think "yes" for all three. There was some handwaving about someone maybe not wanting it, but an utter lack of convincing use-cases; so I see no point in going to the effort of providing a switch. Note that 2 and 3 are actually the same thing (if you think they are not, then you are putting the behavior in the wrong place). regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: