Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 481F0525.2060702@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore ("Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT" <Andreas.Zeugswetter@s-itsolutions.at>) |
Ответы |
Re: statement timeout vs dump/restore
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas OSB sIT wrote: >>> Do we want the following: >>> >>> 1. pg_dump issues "set statement_timeout = 0;" to the >>> >> database prior to >> >>> taking its copy of data (yes/no/default-but-switchable) >>> 2. pg_dump/pg_restore issue "set statement_timeout = 0;" in >>> >> text mode >> >>> output (yes/no/default-but-switchable) >>> 3. pg_restore issues "set statement_timeout = 0;" to the >>> >> database in >> >>> restore mode (yes/no/default-but-switchable) >>> >> I think "yes" for all three. There was some handwaving about someone >> maybe not wanting it, but an utter lack of convincing use-cases; so >> I see no point in going to the effort of providing a switch. >> >> Note that 2 and 3 are actually the same thing (if you think they are >> not, then you are putting the behavior in the wrong place). >> > > I thought a proper fix for 3 would not depend on 2 ? > > > I'm sure we could separate the two if we wanted to. Since we don't it's been put in the most natural spot, which does both. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: