Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
От | Simon Riggs |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CANP8+jKWcZEv75BPO4dxsDNa+yMGriZ3Zr8MJosnJ33hPGHxcw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 29 May 2015 at 02:50, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
--
On 5/28/15 3:35 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
> What we would need for this is an 'extensions' directory, or similar,
> and a clear definition of what the requirements are around getting into
> it are. With that, we could decide for each module currently in contrib
> if it should go into the 'extensions' directory. I'm not sure that we
> would necessairly have to remove the contrib module or any modules which
> are deemed to not be appropriate for the 'extensions' directory.
This seems reasonable to me. It's in line with the recent move from
contrib to bin. It'll just be quite a bit bigger of an undertaking.
(50 threads to discuss the merits of each module separately?) Maybe
start by picking the top 5 and sort those out.
+1 for Extensions directory for 9.6
This doesn't seem worth delaying the release for.
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: