Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely

On Fri, Jun  5, 2015 at 02:42:45PM +0100, Simon Riggs wrote:
> On 29 May 2015 at 02:50, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> wrote:
> 
>     On 5/28/15 3:35 PM, Stephen Frost wrote:
>     > What we would need for this is an 'extensions' directory, or similar,
>     > and a clear definition of what the requirements are around getting into
>     > it are.  With that, we could decide for each module currently in contrib
>     > if it should go into the 'extensions' directory.  I'm not sure that we
>     > would necessairly have to remove the contrib module or any modules which
>     > are deemed to not be appropriate for the 'extensions' directory.
> 
>     This seems reasonable to me.  It's in line with the recent move from
>     contrib to bin.  It'll just be quite a bit bigger of an undertaking.
>     (50 threads to discuss the merits of each module separately?)  Maybe
>     start by picking the top 5 and sort those out.
> 
> 
> +1 for Extensions directory for 9.6
> 
> This doesn't seem worth delaying the release for.

I didn't think any of this was for 9.5 consideration.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +