Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
| От | Peter Eisentraut |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 5567C5EB.3070703@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely
Re: RFC: Remove contrib entirely |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 5/28/15 3:35 PM, Stephen Frost wrote: > What we would need for this is an 'extensions' directory, or similar, > and a clear definition of what the requirements are around getting into > it are. With that, we could decide for each module currently in contrib > if it should go into the 'extensions' directory. I'm not sure that we > would necessairly have to remove the contrib module or any modules which > are deemed to not be appropriate for the 'extensions' directory. This seems reasonable to me. It's in line with the recent move from contrib to bin. It'll just be quite a bit bigger of an undertaking. (50 threads to discuss the merits of each module separately?) Maybe start by picking the top 5 and sort those out.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: