Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
От | Bharath Rupireddy |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALj2ACVJn6rDOGrRMu9TudcUTeMj6eu-T_78mm+pJgM5qET-AA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi, On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 3:04 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > We should not allow the invalid replication slot to be altered > > > > > irrespective of the reason unless there is any benefit. > > > > > > > > Okay, then I think we need to change the existing behaviour of the > > > > other invalidation causes which still allow alter-slot. > > > > > > +1. Perhaps, track it in a separate thread? > > > > I think so. It does not come under the scope of this thread. > > It makes sense to me as well. But let's go ahead and get that sorted out first. Moved the discussion to new thread - https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACW4fSOMiKjQ3%3D2NVBMTZRTG8Ujg6jsK9z3EvOtvA4vzKQ%40mail.gmail.com. Please have a look. -- Bharath Rupireddy PostgreSQL Contributors Team RDS Open Source Databases Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: