Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation

On Tue, Sep 10, 2024 at 12:13 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 3:04 PM Amit Kapila <amit.kapila16@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > We should not allow the invalid replication slot to be altered
> > > > > > irrespective of the reason unless there is any benefit.
> > > > >
> > > > > Okay, then I think we need to change the existing behaviour of the
> > > > > other invalidation causes which still allow alter-slot.
> > > >
> > > > +1. Perhaps, track it in a separate thread?
> > >
> > > I think so. It does not come under the scope of this thread.
> >
> > It makes sense to me as well. But let's go ahead and get that sorted out first.
>
> Moved the discussion to new thread -
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CALj2ACW4fSOMiKjQ3%3D2NVBMTZRTG8Ujg6jsK9z3EvOtvA4vzKQ%40mail.gmail.com.
> Please have a look.
>

That is pushed now. Please send the rebased patch after addressing the
pending comments.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.