Re: Introduce XID age and inactive timeout based replication slot invalidation

On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 10:28 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 10:26 AM Bharath Rupireddy
> <bharath.rupireddyforpostgres@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 9, 2024 at 9:17 AM shveta malik <shveta.malik@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > We should not allow the invalid replication slot to be altered
> > > > irrespective of the reason unless there is any benefit.
> > >
> > > Okay, then I think we need to change the existing behaviour of the
> > > other invalidation causes which still allow alter-slot.
> >
> > +1. Perhaps, track it in a separate thread?
>
> I think so. It does not come under the scope of this thread.
>

It makes sense to me as well. But let's go ahead and get that sorted out first.

--
With Regards,
Amit Kapila.