Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles
От | Magnus Hagander |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CABUevEx04NTJS-x5Goxf1cAduA3bUuZ0GehOGUyqjxuWJ0qxUg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
>>>>> Are these votes for getting rid of both win32.mak and bcc32.mak?
>
>> PFA a patch that does this. Did I miss something? :)
>
> Perhaps we should get rid of the WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER symbol altogether;
> given this patch, "#ifdef WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER" could be replaced by
> "#ifdef _MSC_VER".
That's here in the patch for people wondering:
-#if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__)
+#if defined(_MSC_VER)
#define WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER
#endif
+1 for the renaming.
Ok, since we have two votes for it, I will go ahead and do that (as a separate patch pushed together).'
> Or maybe rename it to something else --- I'm not sure what, but
> I've always found that symbol rather confusing.
No complains here as well. Thanks for the patch.
Thanks.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: