Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170411201757.GB20340@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 03:14:23PM +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 4:18 AM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > >>>>> Are these votes for getting rid of both win32.mak and bcc32.mak? > > > >> PFA a patch that does this. Did I miss something? :) > > > > Perhaps we should get rid of the WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER symbol altogether; > > given this patch, "#ifdef WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER" could be replaced by > > "#ifdef _MSC_VER". > > That's here in the patch for people wondering: > -#if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__) > +#if defined(_MSC_VER) > #define WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER > #endif > +1 for the renaming. > > > Ok, since we have two votes for it, I will go ahead and do that (as a separate > patch pushed together).' I am fine with removing things, but I do remember one reason the Borland part was kept is that some tool would only work with the Borland-compiled library, not gcc or MSVC, but that was long ago. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com + As you are, so once was I. As I am, so you will be. + + Ancient Roman grave inscription +
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: