Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqTjoMs9AWdTdJ+1-2ACPaxZQd0PAOR4z615xiTVo1M3xg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] src/interfaces/libpq shipping nmake-related Makefiles
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 1:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: >>>>> Are these votes for getting rid of both win32.mak and bcc32.mak? > >> PFA a patch that does this. Did I miss something? :) > > Perhaps we should get rid of the WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER symbol altogether; > given this patch, "#ifdef WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER" could be replaced by > "#ifdef _MSC_VER". That's here in the patch for people wondering: -#if defined(_MSC_VER) || defined(__BORLANDC__) +#if defined(_MSC_VER)#define WIN32_ONLY_COMPILER#endif +1 for the renaming. > Or maybe rename it to something else --- I'm not sure what, but > I've always found that symbol rather confusing. No complains here as well. Thanks for the patch. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: