Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYZS04G76LeAq+9B594C9b46V56bD8LZrkRnmo-kjJwZw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT  ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>)
Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> On 1 June 2016 at 11:48, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Could it be possible to mark PostmasterPid with PGDLLIMPORT on HEAD
>> and back-branches?
>
> Sounds sensible to me.

I don't really want to set a precedent that we'll back-patch
PGDLLIMPORT markings every time somebody needs a new symbol for some
extension they are writing, but I don't mind changing this in master.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Masahiko Sawada
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Rename synchronous_standby_names?
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types