Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYZS04G76LeAq+9B594C9b46V56bD8LZrkRnmo-kjJwZw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT
Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 1 June 2016 at 11:48, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: >> Could it be possible to mark PostmasterPid with PGDLLIMPORT on HEAD >> and back-branches? > > Sounds sensible to me. I don't really want to set a precedent that we'll back-patch PGDLLIMPORT markings every time somebody needs a new symbol for some extension they are writing, but I don't mind changing this in master. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: