Re: PostmasterPid not marked with PGDLLIMPORT

Robert Haas wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> > On 1 June 2016 at 11:48, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Could it be possible to mark PostmasterPid with PGDLLIMPORT on HEAD
> >> and back-branches?
> >
> > Sounds sensible to me.
> 
> I don't really want to set a precedent that we'll back-patch
> PGDLLIMPORT markings every time somebody needs a new symbol for some
> extension they are writing, but I don't mind changing this in master.

I wonder why is that -- just to reduce the commit load?  I don't think
this kind of change is likely to break anything, is it?

-- 
Álvaro Herrera                http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services